Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editorial: user agent does not mean assistive technology #210

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 2, 2023

Conversation

spectranaut
Copy link
Contributor

@spectranaut spectranaut commented Oct 31, 2023

Closes #200

After an audit, this seems to be the only two places where user agent is used in this incorrect way.


Preview | Diff

Copy link
Contributor

@cookiecrook cookiecrook left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm thx

@spectranaut spectranaut merged commit 4701d18 into main Nov 2, 2023
2 checks passed
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2023
SHA: 4701d18
Reason: push, by spectranaut

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Core-AAM seems to define "User Agents" as Assistive Technology
3 participants